|
Mr Yard
provided this written report ...
• Our focus
is about to change to Development. Last meeting I asked
clubs to nominate players they consider suitable for
Development. No replies were received.
It
is not intended to invite players with 2000 birth
dates to the ‘late’ session on Tuesday as they are
considered too young. Players of that age have the
opportunity for development and a competition on
Sunday morning. If we have to, it will be for
composite teams using the Pony League draft system.
We
are hopeful of extending the Development Program to
include an opportunity for players aged 12 years and
older. This program will be Thursday night at
Kellyville. The use of word hopeful relates to fact
that we are able to attract sufficient players.
We
really need to target next season’s Under 14 players
as we will be very weak in that age group next
season. We will be relying on this year’s Under 12
to bolster this team- quite probably to lead the
team.
The
standard of play in the Hay League round robin,
apart from Baulkham Hills has been quite
disappointing. In that competition Castle Hill has
to win and win very easily to reach the Grand Final.
• The
meeting has a decision to make in relation to what
started as a protest however, due to the way it was
handled by Kings Langley it became a technical breach.
There is absolutely no doubt that Carlingford’s
Under 12 Leonard South team breached the rule
relating to the first nine batters must be the first
nine fielders. Had it been a protest it would have
been dismissed as the difference in the score was
too great and the player involved did not have any
effect on the result. Carlingford would have been
fined as neither the coach or umpire knew the rules.
Ignorance of the rules cannot be used as an excuse.
Whatever you decide a similar penalty should be
imposed on Rouse Hill (again Leonard South) who did
the same thing last Saturday.
My
opinion is that you should review the rule – it is
an old T Ball rule that has been surpassed in Live
Ball by the need to bat all available players. To
make a decision legal a coach can replace the player
after one pitch.
As a
matter of course the playing rules should be
reviewed at the end of each season. Should clubs
have any suggested changes these should be submitted
by the April meeting.
• There
was a meeting last meeting between Bankstown and
Macarthur with a view to merging. I believe the meeting
was initiated by Macarthur.
Not
all of Bankstown clubs were said to be in favour of
merging. Macarthur is struggling as are most
Associations other than Hills, Ryde and Cronulla.
• The
coaches for the Little League teams have been confirmed.
Coaches are Hills North – Darian Lindsay ( Head Coach),
Greg Clarke and Stuart Rofe are the Assistants. Hills
South – Greg Giffin (Head Coach), Richard West and James
Waddell are the Assistants.
• Hills
now has an application for Blacktown Workers to join
Hills. Blacktown presently has approximately six teams.
The future of Holroyd is dependant upon what develops in
the proposed Bankstown – Macarthur merger. Holroyd were
interested in joining Bankstown. No doubt travelling to
Macarthur will be a deterrent.
BNSW
are saying that Cumberland is no longer viable and
the Association has agreed with that. Cumberland on
the other hand is denying it said or intimated that
adding that it has not ‘given up’ hope.
• We are
offering winter junior competitions in Under 10 (Live
ball or Mod Ball), Under 12, 14 and 16 competitions. Age
eligibility would be under the age as at 31st December,
2009. The Under 16 will be a Friday night competition.
• To
comply with the coaching accreditation required for
Little League we need to conduct a level 0 course for at
least three of the LL coaches. We will offer an
additional nine persons to gain Level 0 accreditation if
they are interested. Hopefully we can announce the
details of the course tonight.
• I
forwarded the Clubs information of Sport, Youth and
Recreation courses. Some are Sport Education Courses
whilst another two designed for Clubs (Running you Club
and Team Managers). For further details visit DSR web
site
• Rumour
has it that the Major League Committee is attempting to
reduce the ML Competition to eight teams – it is being
said that the clubs to go are North Shore and Auburn,
with Canterbury and Macarthur to merge. As I said it is
just a rumour however, the Super Six concept is not
dead.
What
is the number of Junior Associations if Bankstown
and Macarthur merge? Just a co incidence….six.
• The
Under 17 Youth Grand Final is scheduled for Kellyville
on Friday night. The Under 12 Douglass is to be played
Saturday at Kellyville.
The
Hay League Grand Final will be played on Friday
20th. The remaining Grand Finals will be played at
Bensons on Saturday 21st although there is a
possibility that the Cashmore North game could
become a night game at Kellyville.
•
Sometime before June we should be discussing whether we
have the correct structure of the competitions. My
personal opinion is that Under 8 has become a shambles
and because there are no points it is almost ‘anything
goes’. ‘It is only T Ball’ covers the Coaches ignorance
for the rules..
Under 12 Leonard South is a basket case – pitchers
cannot throw strikes and there are only two or three
innings being played each and every week. The idea
to bring out the tee after a player ‘receives four
balls’ will only slow the game down even further. It
is another advantage to ‘bat for a walk’.
My
personal opinion is that players leave T Ball far
too early. They do not learn the basics and are ill
equipped to play at Under 12 level and above, when
they eventually get there. T Ball may not be perfect
but it is the best learning aid that the sport has.
A
large percentage of Leonard South teams would have
benefited more from playing T Ball rather than
standing around watching ball after ball being
thrown. One team threw 14 walks in one game – the
opposition managed to hit one ball out of the
infield. That is not baseball- nor is it unusual-
try 11 walks in 18 batters!. The team that threw so
many walks were semi finalists.
Same
comment applies to the bottom teams in Petroff /Daisley.
There are four teams which are 11 or more points
adrift of the 6 th placed team – 28 points behind
the Premiers. Those four teams were much better off
playing T Ball.
Hills’ weakness is to have viable first and second
division competitions. I can see no justification to
allow teams to nominate two teams in Southern
Conferences and none in higher conferences. Yes I
know it saves angst with parents, but what do the
players learn?
If
you look at the statistics of Douglass and Leonard
North games last week – the Leonard North was the
superior game. Less walks and fewer errors.
• There
is a new proposal for the SJC in season 2009/10. As
usual it is being rushed through without any time to
have an intelligent debate. In summary it is the view of
the Executive that what is being proposed will not work.
It
is almost ludicrous. We will ask for the vote to be
deferred – if that is unsuccessful we will probably
vote No.
The
proposal was best described as either at the best-
they do not know exactly what they are doing or at
the worst- they do not know what they are doing.
If
it is implemented it will further weaken the club
structure. The number of registrations are falling
reasonably rapidly this will do nothing to reverse
that. The sport cannot afford to lose the Club
player. If teams cannot get outs and players no
longer get satisfaction of playing they will look
for another sport which will give them satisfaction
At
Representative level not all coaches want to be
involved every week, same with volunteer Umpires.
Most people will have been involved with their
Club’s on the Saturday.
Next
step will be to take the representative players out
of Club competition and play ‘reps’ only. In the
early 2000’s this could have nearly have been
achieved – but player numbers and quality of player
are much weaker now.
The
ironic part is the proposal is being submitted at a
meeting for a Coaches de brief of last season. It is
almost as if we don’t care what you think, here is a
fait accompli proposal for next season.
• Castle
Hill has won both the Club Championship and the
Incentive Shield. The points in both are as follows:
[See Hills
Website for details]
One
change that I will be recommending before the
2009-10 season is a change to how the Club
Championship is calculated. At present it is based
on the points of each team a Club has in each
competition (apart from Under 8 obviously) –
irrespective of grade.
What
will be suggested is a ‘weighting’ being applied
which recognizes the first division teams are in
fact superior to say Southern Conference teams.
Whether that weighting is multiplied by three or
four I am unsure. Northern Conferences would be
multiplied by two and Southern Conferences by one.
At the same time we should revisit the incentive
Shield just to ensure every club with sufficient
teams can win that trophy/ honour.
Personally I would hate to see the Club Championship
being awarded to a club because it could dominate
the Southern Conferences at the expense of clubs who
strive to place teams in the first Division
competitions. After all that is what the term Club
Championship means – the strongest club through all
grades.
In
addition to the written report, Mr. Yard advised that
-
There was a dispensation request for Under 10 to
play in Under 12 Leonard South
- Mr.
Robinson’s mother passed away requiring Greg to
travel to the USA
- The
donation to Victorian Bushfire Appeal was unable to
be made to the Telethon as it was impossible to ‘get
through’.
The
Secretary’s report was accepted. |